Saturday, March 3, 2018

Jewish Hate Group Says “Radical Traditionalists” Are “Hate Group”

Edit: Morris Dees or his associates have no business holding anyone accountable for anything. The man is an opportunistic lowlife. Now you know who your masters are!
[SPLC] “Radical traditionalist” Catholics, who may make up the largest single group of serious anti-Semites in America, subscribe to an ideology that is rejected by the Vatican and some 70 million mainstream American Catholics. Many of their leaders have been condemned and even excommunicated by the official church.
Adherents of radical traditional Catholicism, or “integrism,” routinely pillory Jews as “the perpetual enemy of Christ” and worse, reject the ecumenical efforts of the Vatican, and sometimes even assert that recent popes have all been illegitimate. They are incensed by the liberalizing reforms of the 1962-65 Second Vatican Council, which condemned hatred for the Jews and rejected the accusation that Jews are collectively responsible for deicide in the form of the crucifixion of Christ.
Radical traditionalists are not the same as Catholics who call themselves “traditionalists” — people who prefer the old Latin Mass to the mass now typically said in vernacular languages — although the radicals, as well, like their liturgy in Latin. They also embrace extremely conservative social ideals with respect to women.

https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/radical-traditional-catholicism
AMDG

43 comments:

  1. He should read the Talmud,that states non Jews are not human and exist only to serve Jews. No Catholic or Christian can hate any human being and still call themselves a Christian.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is it any wonder that western civilization is in precipitous decline? Lunatics are everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Horrors! An offended Jew.
    They live on the "whining-wagon" twenty four hours a day.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Does that include Billy Graham? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRg7xvWyYog

    http://rense.com/general20/billy.htm

    ReplyDelete

  5. Catholics can affirm the traditional teachings of the Church without rejecting Vatican Council II.

    They do not have to 'reject the ecumenical efforts of the Vatican ' once they interpret Vatican Council Ii with the for and neutral to EENS method. Since then Vatican Council II would support Tradition.

    They also do not have to ' assert that recent popes have all been illegitimate' when they realize that Vatican Council II interpreted with this for and neutral to EENS approach is traditional and supports the old ecclesiology of the Church.
    This would be new for the traditionalists and they probably would not believe what I have written here unless they check it out for themselves-Lionel Andrades
    MARCH 3, 2018
    Cardinal Luiz Ladaria uses the for and against EENS method to interpret Vatican Council II and I use the for and neutral to EENS method : so our conclusions are different and the fault does not lie with Vatican Council
    MARCH 3, 2018

    Cardinal Luiz Ladaria takes the cake : What has 'the river of interpretations of Lumen Gentium 8 subsist it ' to do with EENS when they are all hypothetical and invisible cases?
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-takes-cake-what.html
    MARCH 3, 2018

    Jesuit Cardinal Ladaria review the case of Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney he was set up by your office
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/jesuit-cardinal-ladaria-review-case-of.html



    MARCH 2, 2018

    Cardinal Ladaria made a major mistake at the Press Conference for Placuit Deo
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-ladraian-made-major-mistake-at.html


    MARCH 2, 2018

    Cardinal Luiz Ladaria chose to interpret Vatican Council II with the for and against EENS method instead of the for and neutral to EENS method : journalists and conservatives unaware
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-luiz-ladaria-chose-to.html



    MARCH 2, 2018

    The Letter (Placiut Deo) on non exclusive salvation is being faulted not so much for what it says but as for what it does not say and so allows heresy, schism and gnostism to flourish.
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-letter-placiut-deo-on-salvation-is.html


    MARCH 1, 2018

    Cardinal Ladaria presents a gnostic and heretical document which is a schism with the past popes and Magisterium
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/cardinal-ladaria-presents-gnostic-and.html


    FEBRUARY 28, 2018

    Will Pope Francis tomorrow(Thursday) say that there is known salvation outside the Church? : Cushingite document expected ?
    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/will-pope-francis-tomorrow-say-that.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you mind not clogging up every single blog post with your totally unrelated comments? What is wrong with you?

      Delete
  6. We didn't call them the enemies of all men and we didn't say that they are displeasing to God, St Paul already said it for us. The Jewish worldview is summed up in the Lord's parable about the wicked husbandmen "here is the heir, let's kill Him and the vineyard will be ours." They see themselves as the replacement for Christ. The world is theirs you see. How dare you to not bow down and call them gods. They're the chosen people. They want to be called the Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sure francis team B (I'm talkin' mccarrick, cupich, dolan, o'malley) sicced the splc on. Same sodomite pedophile crappers proppin' up planned parenthood: the pedophile cannibal seth rich murderers Podestas and Clintons, cnn, obama, graham, durbin, biden, comey, brennan, pelosi, brown, cuomo, panetta et al.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Whoever you are, I like you.

      Delete
    2. It's just the 'gonna wanna be, don't ya' dribbling idiot Yeehaaww doing another loop of the loop.

      Delete
    3. Said the Gobsheit from Lager Lout Row.

      Delete
  8. You missed the point.
    The SPLC says the traditionalists 'reject the ecumenical efforts of the Vatican '.This is related to the for and neutral to EENS interpretation of Vatican Council II which would be NEW for all of you. The links are related to this subject.Once this approach is used we are back to the old ecclesiology with which there can only be an ecumenism of return.

    Also when traditionalists ' assert that recent popes have all been illegitimate' it is because they interpret Vatican Council II with the for and against EEMS approach. Have patience,please. This too would be NEW for you.

    And finally when they refer to 'the liberalizing reforms of the 1962-65 Second Vatican Council' it must be noted that they are interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational method.This is the common one used by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.This is why Vatican Council II comes across as revolutionary and liberalizing.

    I have tried to explain it here in the following link with examples from Vatican Council II.Once you understand it you will discover that it is very much related to this subject.It is NEW for most people.

    MARCH 4, 2018
    If Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j had used the For and Neutral to EENS approach Lumen Gentium 8 would not be a rupture with the old teaching on the superiority and exclusiveness of salvation in the Catholic Church

    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/if-cardinal-luiz-ladaria-sj-had-used.html

    -Lionel Andrades

    ReplyDelete
  9. You never mention God, Lionel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. On my blog YES.
      The subject here is Vatican Council II and how the traditionalists are interpreting it just like the SPLC, to their loss and the SPLC's gain.
      They need to switch to an alternative rational interpretation of Vatican Council II which would presently be new for them.

      The SPLC is using the old irrational model to interpret Vatican Council II.

      Delete
    2. I don't care if your talking about the nineteenth dilemma of St Copronimous, you still avoid mentioning God, Lionel. It is evident from your exotic, labrynthian mental treks, that everyone, including God need to follow your tortured ideology if the great resolution is to be achieved.

      Delete
    3. I refer to Vatican Council II interpreted with the for and against EENS( extra ecclesiam nulla salus) method being in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.So the traditionalists do not need to reject Vatican Council II.
      The SPLC will still spout it's hate against the traditionalists since it is following the agenda of the extreme Left and that of Satan.But now they will not be able to cite Vatican Council II in their favour.
      With the for and neutral interpretation of EENS the traditionalists would be saying all who die as Catholics would go to Heaven and live there forever with GOD and all who die as non Catholics will go to Hell and live there forever without GOD.
      This would be the pre and post Vatican Council II teaching of the Catholic Church.There would be no change with Vatican Council II It would be the official teaching of the Church interpreted with the rational for and neutral method and not just a personal opinion of mine.-Lionel Andrades

      Delete
    4. MARCH 5, 2018
      The Catholic Church still teaches it only has exclusive salvation .This is there in the text of magisterial documents interpreted with the for and neutral method
      http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/the-catholic-church-still-teaches-that.html

      Delete
    5. Before your thin skinned patron, the Deleter, came to your rescue, Lionel, I resumed the conversation about God in your rambling, tortured ideological bleating. I shall resume my side of the discussion despite the fact that you clearly need an assist.

      Delete
    6. Here is the official teaching of the Church and not my personal opinion

      MARCH 8, 2018
      It's official. There is no denial from the CDF or the Vatican Press Office : All Catholic Religious Communities can affirm that the Church has the superioriy and exclusiveness in salvation and this is not contradicted by Vatican Council II
      http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/03/its-official-there-is-no-denial-from.html

      Delete
    7. History is written by winners or by those who declare themselves winners. The big challenge for everybody, Lionel, is to admit very humbly, that God alone knows that happens to every soul at the moment of death.
      The Magisterium of the Catholic Church does not have this knowledge, no EENS theory can claim it, nor can you or I, Lionel.
      All this speculation is just a doctrinaire salon game.

      Delete
    8. History is written by winners or by those who declare themselves winners. The big challenge for everybody, Lionel, is to admit very humbly, that God alone knows that happens to every soul at the moment of death.
      Lionel:Yes and through the Catholic Church God tells us that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell. This is the general rule and you would not know of any exception.
      __________________

      The Magisterium of the Catholic Church does not have this knowledge, no EENS theory can claim it, nor can you or I, Lionel.
      Lionel: Jesus has this knowledge.He tells us about it in John 3:5, all need the baptism of water for salvation and Mark 16:16 those who do not believe will be condemned.
      EENS is an expression of John 3:5 and Mark 16:16 this was the teaching over the centuries of Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium.
      It is not a private view.
      _____________________

      All this speculation is just a doctrinaire salon game.

      Lionel: This is the official teaching of the Church guided by the Holy Spirit.
      -Lionel Andrades

      Delete
  10. http://www.returntoorder.org/petition/protest-name-blasphemous-ice-cream-company/?PKG=RTOE0450

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jesus the Christ was from the Judeo-Christian tradition. Today's sermon mentioned that Jesus came to fulfill the OT and not to do away with it. Sadly, atheistic Communism was an ethnic Jewish political system which obliterated millions of Christians, mostly Orthodox.---Those that rejected Christ have formed an alliance with radical gays, feminists, unknowing immigrants, and the BLM Movement which was founded by three African-American lesbians (Patrice Cullers et al).----The radical reform movement in the Catholic Church which is Marxist in nature through Teilhard de Chardin does not appear able to differentiate between Saul of Tarsus and Leon Trotsky.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need to offer a great deal of proof of these allegations otherwise they can legitimately set aside as unsubstantiated personal opinion.

      Delete
    2. Are you serious? You speak like a child. Proof? How many dead Ukrainians have to be dug up to prove to fools like you that Jewish communism attempted to wipe out Christian culture. Are you a Jew or just another traitorous Catholic?

      Delete
    3. Bill is a Jew working for the SPLC. He needs to show us proof that it is not otherwise. We need a great deal of proof, Bill D. This site is for Catholics, by the way. You and your co-religionists have hundreds of sites with comment sections you can post on.

      Delete
    4. The onus is on you to prove your allegations. That duty derives from both the demands of both divine and natural justice.
      What would be your response if you were accused of a crime on mere hearsay or baseless accusation?
      Wake up to yourself and act like a Christian.

      Delete
    5. If it walks like a duck...

      Delete
  12. @Bill D: It is experiential opinion using "faction" which was a writing technique used by Malachi Martin. Taylor Caldwell is the most well known user of faction.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Then declare it's your personal opinion from the start, that way people will know immediately that it should be dealt with in the hallucinogenic 'magic mushroom' category.
    'Faction;' what a weasel word that is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bill(ge).....what a weasel you are.

      Delete
    2. Another pathetic bleat from the one shot dribbling Hillbilly who can't help herself.
      Try some serious long term therapy.

      Delete
    3. Therapy, what a weasel like and typically Jewish response. Yes,we pathetic, hillbilly goys just need more therapy. Bill and his people can show us the way. They don't need Christ, they are the replacement for Christ. More homosexuality,more Muslims in Europe, more therapy and drugs to cure our failure to "get" the Jewish weltanschaung, and more Vatican 2!

      Delete
    4. bill(ge)...a meek and 'umble man, with much to be 'umble about.

      Delete
    5. The electro-convulsive therapy has evidently not been successful with either the schizophrenia or the psycholological bed-wetting.

      Delete
    6. Needs to have Pedo stamped on his forehead to warn parents of children.

      Delete
    7. Nancy, despite her obvious mental challenges and public lunacy, doesn't deserved another other kind of distinguishing mark to draw attention to her famed eccentricity.

      Delete
  14. Is Putin on that list?
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/putin-says-jews-apos-russian-164905319.html

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...